The Department of Justice released on June 9, 2023, an unsealed federal indictment of former President Donald Trump, with 37 felony counts related to the mishandling of classified documents, obstructing justice and making false statements. Former Trump aide Walt Nauta also faces charges in the indictment. He was seen removing boxes at Mar-a-Lago on a surveillance camera, according to media reports. Read more…
On April 12, 2022, U.S. President Joe Biden declared that genocide is taking place in Ukraine. “The evidence is mounting,” Biden said, echoing earlier statements by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky that Russian actions in Ukraine constitute genocide. On the basis of known facts and the law, can the two presidents correctly term what the Russians are doing in Ukraine as genocide? Read more…
In March 2022, the White House announced a wide range of sanctions against Russian oligarchs accused of enriching themselves at the expense of the Russian people and providing resources to support President Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine.
In an announcement on March 3, eight oligarchs and their family members and companies were cut off from the U.S. financial system, which froze their U.S. assets and restricted their travel and use of property. Another 19 oligarchs and their 47 family members and close associates were subjected to visa restrictions. Is there a legal basis for such actions?
Read more…
On April 13, the mayor of Greenville, Mississippi, rescinded $500 citations issued to congregants of a local church for violating a “shelter-in-place” order, after a religious freedom suit was filed against the city. The suit was among a handful of court actions related to states’ authority to limit the rights of U.S. residents to engage in activities such as attend church, travel across state lines and enforce eviction provisions during the COVID-19 pandemic. Read more …
With many states softening their shelter-in-place orders and allowing businesses to reopen, one job in great demand was something seldom heard of before the arrival of COVID-19: temperature takers. Many employers are requiring their employees to have their body temperatures taken daily before starting work. But is this and other employer-imposed pandemic response requirements legal?
Read more …
As COVID-19 continues its assault on the country, residents in more than half the states have been ordered to stay home and businesses, including restaurants, health clubs and entire malls, have been closed as governors nationwide take extraordinary steps in an effort to protect public health. Under what legal authority do such orders fall – and are there legal limits on government actions during a health emergency? Read more …
“Nobody should be allowed to burn the American flag – if they do, there must be consequences – perhaps loss of citizenship or a year in jail!” then President-elect Trump tweeted in mid-November 2016. Can a person be punished for burning or desecrating the American flag? If they own the flag, they cannot, according to two Supreme Court decisions. Read more …
When a Google engineer was fired this month after his 10-page document chastising the company's diversity efforts became public, it raised questions about whether free speech is protected in the workplace. There is no blanket protection, and the extent of protection depends on many factors. Read more …
At an Alabama political rally on Sept. 22, President Donald Trump said, “Wouldn’t you love to see one of these NFL owners, when somebody disrespects our flag, to say, ‘Get that son of a (expletive) off the field right now. Out. He’s fired. He’s fired!'” But can government leaders or employers force individuals to participate, in the customary way, in national rituals? Read more …
In late summer of 2017, a resident asked the village board of Mundelein, Ill., a northwest suburb of Chicago, to place a Hanukkah menorah in a public park next to the traditional Christmas tree. Village attorney Charles Marino provided this guidance: “My (legal) research has indicated that a Christmas tree or a holiday tree is secular,” he told the Chicago Tribune. “It is not a religious symbol. It is neutral. However, a menorah is a religious symbol and a creche is a religious symbol. …And so, a safe harbor is where the village is right now.” The Mundelein Village Board turned down the request. Read more …
Amid planned walkouts nationwide by high school students in February, the superintendent for the Needville (Texas) Independent School District threatened three days of suspension for students who participated in such a protest. “Every choice has a consequence whether it be positive or negative. We will discipline no matter if it is one, fifty, or five hundred students involved,” Curtis Rhodes said. No suspensions have been reported and the superintendent’s position raises the question of student First Amendment rights. Read more …
“Hate speech is not protected by the First Amendment.” – Portland Mayor Ted Wheeler after two men were killed in the spring of 2017 when they confronted another individual who was uttering anti-Muslim slurs.
But that analysis is wrong.
Read more …
A month ago, Instagram blocked Robert F. Kennedy Jr., son of the late attorney general and senator, after he repeatedly told followers not to trust “mainstream media, government health officials” who say the coronavirus vaccines are safe. The decision thrusts the scion of one of America’s most prominent political families into a distinctive class of social media outliers who have been banned or suspended for promoting falsehoods or hatred.
But are these actions legal? Do actions by social media platforms to ban or suspend individual accounts infringe on an individual's free speech guarantees under the First Amendment? Read more …
The U.S. Supreme Court is considering the constitutionality of President Donald Trump's travel bans, which were done through executive orders. Among other issues, the actions have raised the issue: What are the limits on presidential executive orders? Read more …
A U.S. president has broad powers to issue pardons to individuals involved in criminal investigations. But are those powers unlimited? No, there are some limitations such as for offenses on a state level. And, it is unsettled whether a president can pardon him- or herself. Read more …
In November 2017, the U.S. Department of Justice filed lawsuits to revoke the U.S. citizenship of five immigrants who concealed in their naturalization applications that they pleaded guilty to sexually abusing minors in incidents said to occur before they were naturalized. Amid a federal crackdown on immigrants, the lawsuits raise questions of whether and when can a person’s citizenship be revoked. Read more …
On Nov. 7, the U.S. Secret Service stopped CNN reporter Jim Acosta from entering White House grounds and took his media credentials after an incident earlier that day during President Donald Trump’s news conference. A video of the encounter appeared to show that Acosta brushed up against a White House intern who was dispatched to take away his microphone to keep him from asking further questions. “We will not tolerate the inappropriate behavior clearly documented in this video,” White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders tweeted later that night. Six days later, CNN sued, seeking Acosta’s reinstatement, which a judge granted in a limited order on Nov. 16. Acosta's credentials were subsequently reinstated and CNN dropped the suit. Read more …
On July 23, U.S. Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., tweeted that he would be meeting later in the day with President Donald Trump and would “ask him to revoke John Brennan’s security clearance!” Brennan is the former CIA director who has been outspoken in his criticism of the president. About three weeks later, the president revoked Brennan’s privileges and indicated more such actions were on their way. Read more …
Recent news reports indicate that White House staff have routinely signed non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) limiting what they can say about their public service. On Aug. 14, White House spokeswoman Sarah Huckabee Sanders observed that it is "common in a lot of places for employees to sign NDAs, including in government, particularly anyone with a security clearance." But are these agreements legally enforceable? Read more …
House Speaker Paul Ryan, a Republican from Wisconsin, was asked by reporters on June 6 for his reaction to a tweet by President Donald Trump that he could pardon himself and others to erase any convictions related to the special counsel’s probe of his campaign’s ties to Russia. “He shouldn’t, and no one is above the law,” Ryan responded. Two days earlier, Trump had tweeted, "As has been stated by numerous legal scholars, I have the absolute right to PARDON myself, but why would I do that when I have done nothing wrong?” It also followed the suggestion by Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani that a sitting U.S. president could not be indicted. Read more …
On Feb. 15, President Donald Trump signed a declaration of emergency to fund construction of a border wall, after ending the threat of another partial government shutdown but triggering another battle that likely will be headed to the federal courts.
“I expect to be sued,” President Trump said on Feb. 15. “I think we will be very successful in court. … Sadly, we will go through a process, and happily we will win.” Based on case and statutory law, what are the president’s chances of prevailing with the wall? Read more …
President Donald Trump has indicated he is weighing the fate of Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein. “My preference would be to keep him,” Trump said at a news conference in New York on Sept. 26 when asked if he planned to fire Rosenstein. “I would certainly prefer not doing it.” From a legal and procedural standpoint, it can matter whether a political appointee resigns or is fired. Read more …
On Jan. 19, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an 8-1 ruling denying former President Donald Trump’s request for executive privilege to block the release of nearly 800 pages of documents to the House select committee investigating the Jan. 6 Capitol attack. Did the court’s opinion decide the constitutional question of whether former presidents can invoke executive privilege?
Read more …
On May 8, two legal developments in the nation’s capital intersected. The House Judiciary Committee voted to hold Attorney General William Barr in contempt of Congress; shortly afterward, a contempt of Congress citation in the House, which dated back to 2012 against then-Attorney General Eric Holder, was settled. Both AGs had refused to turn over documents subpoenaed as part of a House investigation. Read more …
In a media appearance a few days before the Dec. 12 special election in Alabama, U.S. Sen. Susan Collins, a Republican from Maine, indicated that her colleagues would have to seat controversial Alabama Republican Roy Moore in the U.S. Senate if he wins. “If he is elected, there are no grounds under the Constitution to fail to seat him,” Collins said. But Moore lost the race. Read more …
In this era of divided government, opposing views originating from one branch of government and volleyed at another are often construed as threats to the separation of powers. The perceived threats cross party lines. Read more …
For the second time in 13 months, the U.S. House of Representatives has voted to impeach President Donald J. Trump. The decision of whether the president will be found guilty now goes to the U.S. Senate, where the question faces an uncertain political and legal road ahead.
Read more …
In mid-December, National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster was quoted as saying that U.S. officials were “increasingly concerned” that Russia was using “sophisticated campaigns of subversion and disinformation and propaganda … to polarize democratic societies.” This would be consistent with allegations of Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. But such actions may not break U.S. law. Read more …
This spring, numerous candidates for president expressed support for either abolishing or changing the Electoral College, which ultimately picks the U.S. president. The National Archives reports that over the past 200 years more than 700 proposals have been introduced in Congress to reform or eliminate the Electoral College – without any becoming law. Read more …
Victorious North Carolina congressional candidate Mark Harris, a Republican who beat his Democratic opponent by 905 votes, said he was not averse to a special election following allegations that a consultant working for his campaign illegally confiscated absentee ballots. “If this investigation finds proof of illegal activity … on a level that it could have changed the outcome of the election, then I would wholeheartedly support a new election,” Harris said. But who legally decides whether there should be a re-do? Read more …
During the August Republican convention, with a lineup filled with top Cabinet officials and other Trump administration officials, White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows shrugged off complaints that there were numerous violations of the Hatch Act, a law which limits political activities of federal employees. “Nobody outside of the Beltway really cares,” he told Politico.
“What it's really designed to do,” Meadows said of the Hatch Act, “is to make sure people like myself and others do not use their political position to try to convince …other federal employees that they need to vote one way, need to register one way or need to campaign in one way.” Is Meadows correct in his interpretation of the law? Read more …
On Oct. 22, 2017, American-British financier Bill Browder tweeted, “Not only did Putin add me to the Interpol list, but the US simultaneously revoked my visa." Browder is the hedge fund manager turned human rights activist who championed the Magnitsky Act, a 2012 U.S. law aimed at punishing Russians officials involved in corruption, which was passed following the mysterious 2009 death of Browder’s Russian lawyer while in custody. The U.S. government quickly reversed itself, saying Browder’s revocation was an administrative mistake. Read more …
In late January, amid the national debate on immigration, U.S. Sen. Chris Murphy, a Connecticut Democrat, tweeted: “Reminder: ‘chain migration’ is a made up term by the hardline anti-immigration crowd. Its purpose is to dehumanize immigrants. If you’re using that word, you’re declaring a side.” Read more …
President Donald Trump kicked off a recent debate when he claimed he can use an executive order to end citizenship that is automatically granted to U.S.-born children of undocumented immigrants. “They’re saying I can do it just with an executive order,” he said, in an interview with the news site Axios. His position met strong opposition, including from influential members of his own Republican party. “You cannot end birthright citizenship with an executive order,” House Speaker Paul Ryan said flatly. Who’s right? Read more …
On July 5, President Donald Trump tweeted that undocumented or illegal immigrants should be immediately forced to leave the United States without any court review. “When people, with or without children, enter our Country, they must be told to leave without our... country being forced to endure a long and costly trial. Tell the people ‘OUT,’ and they must leave, just as they would if they were standing on your front lawn. Hiring thousands of ‘judges’ does not work and is not acceptable.” Read more …
If the U.S. is “full,” can it still accept additional immigrants who are seeking asylum? Under U.S. law and international accords, foreign nationals have certain legal rights for claiming refugee status and asylum, and the numerical limits depend on the status they seek. Read more …
Within hours of President Donald Trump announcing that U.S. military forces would be deployed to the U.S.-Mexican border, Defense Secretary James Mattis clarified the military mission. “We are not doing law enforcement,” he told reporters. “We do not have arrest authority. … There is no arrest authority under Posse Comitatus for the U.S. federal troops. That can be done but it has to be done in accordance with the law.” What does the law allow? Read more …
The horrific shooting at a country music concert in Las Vegas on Oct. 1 renewed the unsettled national debate on gun control, including the legality of owning automatic weapons. Current state laws differ governing restrictions on types of firearms a person can own, and the U.S. Supreme Court has shown reluctance, except on occasion, to weigh in on matters dealing with the Second Amendment. Read more …
Immediately after Chicago police officer Jason Van Dyke was found guilty on Oct. 4 of the second-degree murder of 17-year old Laquan McDonald, the officer’s lawyer said: “If police officers think that they can never fire against somebody that is acting the way Laquan McDonald was ... police officers are going to become security guards.” Is the lawyer right? Read more …
Immediately after Florida enacted comprehensive legislation on March 9 to restrict the sale of some firearms and gun-related accessories, the National Rifle Association filed suit to stop the law from taking effect. NRA executive Chris Cox says the NRA is “confident that the courts will vindicate our view that Florida’s ban is a blatant violation of the Second Amendment.” The skirmish raises the legal question of how far can states go to control firearms. Read more …
On June 15, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to review eight separate cases challenging the doctrine of qualified immunity, which protects police and other governmental officials from civil lawsuits. Does the law protect police from being held liable for money damages for most brutality and other civil rights violations? Read more …
The Trump administration has filed charges in federal civilian court against Sayfullo Saipov, a non-citizen, arrested for driving a truck killing eight people down a bike path on Oct. 31 in New York City. U.S. Sen. John McCain, among others, said Saipov should face a military tribunal. Read more …
In the past few weeks, Acting Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Chad Wolf delivered seemingly contradictory statements regarding federal intervention in local security matters. Shortly after a combination of federal forces arrived in July in Portland, Oregon, he tweeted, “I don’t need invitations by the state, state mayors or state governors to do our job.” But when asked Aug. 23 on CNN whether DHS would provide security for the Nov. 3 general election, Wolf responded, "We don't have any authority to do that.” What is the difference? Read more …
With hurricane season here, state and local authorities have the lawful power to order mandatory evacuations to protect lives either before or after a natural or man-made disaster. But residents in the path of a storm may believe these orders force them to choose between following the law and protecting their property. Read more …
“Treason” has become a popular term in today’s lexicon. In July, former CIA Director John Brennan referred to President Donald Trump’s press conference with Vladimir Putin as “nothing short of treasonous." Last month, former Trump advisor David Bossie said former White House staffer Omarosa Manigault Newman “committed treason” against the president by detailing confidential information in her recent book. And on Sept 5, the president himself tweeted “TREASON?” in response to an anonymous senior official’s op-ed in The New York Times that detailed chaos in the White House. But do any of these actions constitute “treason” under the law? Read more …
On June 29, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down race-based admissions policy at Harvard University and the University of North Carolina. Many U.S. colleges and universities have used race as a factor in college admissions to help enroll a diverse student body. [Updated June 29, 2023] Read more …
The results of the Nov. 5, 2019 state election in Virginia means control of both the House of Delegates and the Senate will shift in 2020. This has raised the prospect that next year Virginia could become the critical 38th state to ratify the Equal Rights Amendment, which has languished since Congress’ deadline for ratification expired in 1982. Read more …
In recent weeks, a steady stream of sexual harassment charges against men has affected various sectors of the U.S. economy. Some of the allegations could land in court, although experts suggest not all will be winnable cases. “You’ll see case after case where a woman was groped at work and the court will dismiss the case as a matter of law, finding that’s not sexual harassment,” University of Cincinnati law professor Sandra Sperino said on NPR in late November. Read more …
Calls to break up the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals are floated on a regular basis. They surfaced again in late April after the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against President Trump's immigrant travel ban. Could such a breakup be done? Yes, but breaking up, even for a federal judicial circuit, can be hard to do. Read more …
On Oct. 11, President Donald Trump suggested that NBC invited a challenge to its broadcast license because of its reporting on his administration. But on what grounds can a broadcast license be successfully challenged? Read more …
On April 9, the FBI raided the New York law office and temporary residence of lawyer Michael Cohen. The next day his most well-known client, President Donald Trump, tweeted: “Attorney-client privilege is dead!” Trump’s tweet raises the question of how far the privilege extends. The confidentiality of communications between a client and his or her attorney is one of the oldest recognized privileges, dating back to at least Queen Elizabeth I in English common law. Read more …
Testifying before a U.S. Senate Appropriations Committee in late April, U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions declined to say whether his recusal from campaign-related investigations also extends to the federal inquiry into President Donald Trump’s personal lawyer Michael Cohen. “I should not answer that question,” Sessions said, citing departmental rules about refraining from publicly discussing ongoing inquiries. “It would be inappropriate.”
Read more …
This summer, calls on twitter suggested conducting a boycott of the 2020 U.S. census if it included a question about U.S. citizenship. But under the law, avoiding even a single question on the census can carry potential criminal consequences, including a fine of up to $5,000. Read more …
In public remarks on Sept. 16, Attorney General William Barr strongly asserted that on matters of federal prosecution, he is in charge. “What exactly am I interfering with?” he asked, alluding to complaints he improperly intervened in a handful of high-profile cases. “Under the law, all prosecutorial power is invested in the attorney general.” Is Barr correct? Read more …
The U.S. Congress made the election of Joe Biden as president official with the Jan. 6 count of the Electoral College vote. The action capped a politically charged two months, with campaign and allies of President Donald J. Trump filing dozens of lawsuits alleging unsubstantiated widespread irregularities and fraud in the 2020 presidential election. Read more …
At a U.S. House of Representatives hearing on March 22, the ACLU filed testimony contending that Congress, with presidential approval, could alone establish the District of Columbia as the country’s 51st state. At the same hearing, The Heritage Foundation, a conservative group, took a differing view, saying that making D.C. a new state would require constitutional changes.
With the Democrats in control of Congress and the White House, advocates believe D.C. statehood has the best chance of passing in decades. But who is right? Does D.C. statehood require the more difficult path of amending the U.S. Constitution? Read more …
On June 24, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the 1973 abortion decision in Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey nearly two decades later. The ruling followed a leaked draft opinion in the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization case, which raised the legal issue of the doctrine of stare decisis, a Latin term which means “to stand by things decided.”
The majority opinion written by Associate Justice Samuel Alito addresses why he believes precedent should not have to be followed in this case. It also raises the questions of when is the U.S. Supreme Court bound by stare decisis and is overturning precedent that rare? Read more…